DoD, IC, and mission partners

Mission sets, not a vendor’s idea of a fusion cell.

Defense and intelligence teams need intelligence bound to the networks, identities, and weapons-adjacent systems they actually defend — and they need it on connected and air-gapped deployments. Attack Nemesis is built for that constraint, with analysts still signing the assessment.

What we hear

  • Collection that cannot be tailored to a mission without a services army
  • High-side and low-side pictures that never reconcile
  • Automation that cannot be shown to a review board because it has no owner

On the platform

Attack Nemesis · Mission sets

Mission sets this watch

Identity & cloud

48 objects · 6 open

Export to SIEM

Weapon-system adjacent

21 objects · 3 open

Air-gap pack

Partner reporting

33 objects · 5 open

Review caveats

Air-gap pack compiles the same object model. Models draft; a named analyst signs before anything leaves the platform.

Defense & IC — scoped queues, analyst-signed actions.

What changes

Mission-scoped scoring, naming, and queues

Connected and air-gapped installs with the same object model

Actions that carry an analyst signature, not a model’s confidence score

Questions

Common questions

How does Attack Nemesis support DoD and intelligence community teams?
Scoring, naming, and queues are scoped to the mission, so DoD, IC, and mission-partner analysts work intelligence bound to the networks, identities, and weapons-adjacent systems they defend. Tailoring does not require a services army. Attack Nemesis is built on mission sets, not a vendor’s idea of a fusion cell.
Does Attack Nemesis run on air-gapped networks?
Yes. Connected and air-gapped installs share the same object model, so analysts work the same way on either side instead of learning two tools. Attack Nemesis is built for the connected-and-air-gapped constraint, not retrofitted to it.
Can Attack Nemesis automation stand up to a review board?
Yes, because every action carries a named analyst’s signature, with an owner and evidence, rather than a model’s confidence score. Leaders can show exactly who decided and why. In Attack Nemesis, automation always has an owner.
Who signs the assessment in Attack Nemesis?
A named analyst. Models extract and draft; attribution, scoring judgment, and the decision to act stay with a person accountable for it. Attack Nemesis keeps analysts signing the assessment.

Next step

A briefing built around defense & intelligence.

A forty-minute briefing: your sources, your stack, and the tickets that should already exist.